cupido/docs/analysis_summary.md
Giorgio e7e4db264d Initial commit: organized project structure for student handoff
Reorganized flat 41-file directory into structured layout with:
- scripts/ for Python analysis code with shared config.py
- notebooks/ for Jupyter analysis notebooks
- data/ split into raw/, metadata/, processed/
- docs/ with analysis summary, experimental design, and bimodal hypothesis tutorial
- tasks/ with todo checklist and lessons learned
- Comprehensive README, PLANNING.md, and .gitignore

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-05 16:08:36 +00:00

2.6 KiB

Analysis Summary: Distance Between Flies

Key Findings

Overall Statistics

  • Trained flies (aligned to barrier opening):

    • Data points: 46,613
    • Mean distance: 92.72
    • Std distance: 111.86
  • Untrained flies (aligned to barrier opening):

    • Data points: 46,866
    • Mean distance: 78.67
    • Std distance: 102.86

Pre-Opening Period (t < 0)

During this period, flies are physically separated by a barrier:

  • Trained mean distance: 155.27
  • Untrained mean distance: 147.19

Post-Opening Period (t > 0)

After the barrier is removed and flies can interact:

  • Trained mean distance: 77.44
  • Untrained mean distance: 61.87

Statistical Tests

Pre-opening period comparison:

  • Trained mean: 155.27, Untrained mean: 147.19
  • T-statistic: 4.4024, P-value: 1.08e-05
  • Cohen's d: 0.0654

Post-opening period comparison:

  • Trained mean: 72.52, Untrained mean: 63.86
  • T-statistic: 30.4693, P-value: 1.08e-203
  • Cohen's d: 0.0914

Within-group changes:

  • Trained flies - Pre vs Post:

    • Mean change: -82.75
    • T-statistic: 77.2805, P-value: 0.00e+00
    • Cohen's d: -0.8313
  • Untrained flies - Pre vs Post:

    • Mean change: -83.33
    • T-statistic: 84.4719, P-value: 0.00e+00
    • Cohen's d: -0.9022

Interpretation

  1. Pre-opening: Both groups show high distances as expected since flies are separated by a barrier. There is a statistically significant difference between groups (p < 0.001), but the effect size is very small (Cohen's d = 0.0654).

  2. Post-opening: Both groups show reduced distances after the barrier is removed, indicating interaction between flies. There is a statistically significant difference between groups (p < 0.001) with a small effect size (Cohen's d = 0.0914).

  3. Within-group changes: Both trained and untrained flies show significant decreases in distance after the barrier opens (p < 0.001). The effect sizes are large for both groups (Cohen's d = -0.8313 for trained, -0.9022 for untrained).

  4. Group Differences:

    • Trained flies maintain slightly higher distances than untrained flies both before and after barrier opening.
    • This could indicate different behavioral patterns between trained and untrained flies, though the effect sizes are small.

Visualization

The plot "avg_distance_aligned_to_opening.png" shows:

  • Blue line: Average distance for trained flies (smoothed)
  • Red line: Average distance for untrained flies (smoothed)
  • Black dashed line: Time of barrier opening (t=0)

The visualization clearly shows the transition from high distances (pre-opening) to lower distances (post-opening) for both groups, with trained flies consistently maintaining slightly higher distances than untrained flies.