Adds a new UNCLEAN criterion to the reviewer agent's system prompt:
direct recommendation language (buy/sell/hold/accumulate/trim/rotate),
allocation guidance (overweight/underweight, "X% in bonds"), price
targets, and personalised framing ("you should", "investors should")
all trigger a reject.
The operator is not licensed to give investment advice; this is
editorial commentary on public data. The generator's system prompt
already forbids buy/sell language, but a prompt-only constraint is
not an enforcement layer. The reviewer agent — already in the
pipeline for chain-of-thought / truncation / meta-commentary — is the
right place to enforce the regulatory boundary structurally: rows
that drift into advice get dropped, and the API falls back to the
previous compliant row.
Descriptive / interpretive language about market state remains
explicitly allowed ("valuations are stretched", "real yields are
restrictive"). The criterion is state vs action: states publish,
actions don't.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Giorgio Gilestro
a6e476b851