MachineSex/results/E12/README.md
Giorgio Gilestro db9452c9d4 E12: model speciation — the merge-compatibility limit of the sexual society
New analytic result for the evolution-of-sex paper: how far can two lineages
diverge before recombination (model merging) stops working? Frames merge failure
as biological reproductive isolation via Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller
incompatibilities. src/knowledge/speciation.py, kind: speciation, on the E7-E11
genotype machinery (pure seeded NumPy, bitwise-reproducible; no external
simulator whose separate RNG would break that).

- BDM construction (E12.yaml): ancestor + two lineages substituting disjoint loci
  (each parent adaptive, incompatibility-free), a fraction rho of cross-lineage
  pairs are BDMIs. Sweeping divergence d reproduces the predicted
  compatible -> outbreeding depression -> hybrid inviability curve; the isolation
  cliff moves to lower d as epistasis density rises (iso at d=20: 0.00/0.03/0.50
  for rho 0.1/0.25/0.5); incompatibilities snowball ~ (d/2)^2 (Orr-Turelli).
- NK variant (E12_nk.yaml): parents = hill-climbed local optima; the epistasis
  wedge — recombination gain flips 0 -> -0.13 and OD rate 0 -> 0.90 as ruggedness
  K rises. At matched divergence, mergeability is governed by epistasis, the axis
  no divergence-only ML merge predictor captures.

plot_E12.py (3-panel), +7 tests (138 green), README with honest positioning
(concedes the empirical phenomenon to Pari 2024 / Zhou 2026 + permutation
artefacts to Git Re-Basin; claims the predictive theory + the epistasis wedge).
Wired into make layer1.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-08 22:40:02 +01:00

3.8 KiB
Raw Blame History

E12 — Model speciation: when two diverged models are too incompatible to merge

Claim tested. The sexual society (E7E11) recombines complementary parents. E12 asks the limit: how far can two lineages diverge before recombination (model merging) stops working? In biology the answer is reproductive isolation via BatesonDobzhanskyMuller incompatibilities (BDMIs) — alleles benign on their own lineage's background but deleterious in combination, which a recombinant inherits untested. A merged model is a single recombinant (an F2-like hybrid-breakdown / recombination-load object, not an F1), so the predicted signature as parental divergence grows is compatible → outbreeding depression → hybrid inviability, arriving earlier the more epistatic the capability landscape.

Setup. Pure seeded NumPy on the E7E11 genotype machinery (bitwise-reproducible; no external simulator, whose separate RNG would break that guarantee). Two landscapes:

  • BDM (configs/layer1/E12.yaml, headline): an ancestor; two lineages each substitute a disjoint set of loci (each parent adaptive, neither carrying an incompatibility); a fraction ρ of cross-lineage locus pairs are BDMIs (penalty s), biting only when a hybrid inherits both derived alleles. Sweep divergence d (substitutions) for several ρ; L=20, 15 reps.
  • NK (configs/layer1/E12_nk.yaml): parents are local optima (hill-climbed) on a Kauffman NK landscape; sweep ruggedness K. The emergent version.

Results

  • The three-regime collapse (BDM). Parent fitness rises linearly with divergence; hybrid fitness tracks it while compatible, then peels off, peaks, and crashes. At dense epistasis (ρ=0.5) hybrids peak near d≈8 and fall to 1.0 by d=20 (below the ancestor = inviable); at sparse epistasis (ρ=0.1) there is mild outbreeding depression and no isolation.
  • The isolation cliff moves with epistasis density. Reproductive-isolation rate (P hybrid inviable) at d=20: ρ=0.1→0.00, ρ=0.25→0.03, ρ=0.50.50 — the cliff arrives at lower divergence the denser the epistasis.
  • The OrrTurelli snowball. The number of incompatibilities grows ~(d/2)² (≈48 at d=20, ρ=0.50.5·10²), so hybrid fitness falls super-linearly — divergence is punished faster than it accrues.
  • The epistasis wedge (NK). At K=0 (additive) recombination is neutral (no isolation — and the two parents can't even diverge, since there is one peak); as ruggedness rises, recombining two adapted local-optimum parents flips from a gain to outbreeding depression (recombination gain 0 → 0.13; OD rate 0 → 0.90 across K=0→10). At matched divergence, mergeability is governed by epistasis — the axis no divergence-only merge predictor captures.

Why it matters / positioning

The ML phenomenon that "specialization/divergence eventually breaks merging" is known empirically (Pari et al. 2024; Zhou et al. 2026), and part of the apparent incompatibility is a permutation artefact (Git Re-Basin). E12's contribution is the predictive theory those lack: the functional form (compatible→OD→inviability), the snowball onset, and the epistasis wedge — merge failure as a DobzhanskyMuller phenomenon whose onset is set by divergence and epistasis, not divergence alone. The design rule: before merging, check divergence against the landscape's ruggedness; beyond the cliff, route (allopatry), don't merge. Falsifier (not triggered): no OD/isolation progression as d and ρ grow — instead the full progression appears, and the additive control shows none. Real-weight confirmation (merging at increasing divergence with permutation alignment, isolating the residual epistatic incompatibility) is the flagged next step; here the analytic model is the anchor.