MachineSex/results/llm_merge_seeds_smol/README.md
Giorgio Gilestro 84124de143 Manuscript revision and pending experiment work, snapshot before restructuring
Clarity pass over the main text (36-item audit), Discussion rewrite and cut,
acknowledgements, Souly et al. as ref 62, lettered SI panels, model section
moved under Results; plus the untracked curriculum/society/compose/smol
configs, runners, figures, stats and tests that the SI already cites.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y64o8FKP7rCuXzC48pxpMm
2026-09-13 16:54:09 +01:00

21 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# llm_merge_seeds_smol — the FisherMuller replication on a second base lineage (SmolLM2-1.7B-Instruct)
**Claim tested (manuscript revision 2026-09-12).** Every language-model result in the paper used one
model lineage (Qwen2.5). Does "merged specialists exceed every parent" hold on an unrelated base?
Base: `HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-1.7B-Instruct` (Apache-2.0, Llama architecture, different lab and
pretraining corpus). Identical protocol to `llm_merge_seeds` (three disjoint families, 600 training
tasks, 3 epochs, rank-16 LoRA, fixed 100-task test sets, soup and TIES merges, 5 training seeds);
`adapters_dir: models/llm_smol` keeps the specialist cache apart from Qwen's. Ran on one L40S in
12 min (`hpc/llm_smol.pbs`). Numbers from `figures/stats_llm_smol.py`; figure `llm_smol.png` (both
lineages side by side).
### Result — replicates, 5/5 seeds, with the same magnitudes
| contrast (SmolLM2) | overall | worst family |
|---|---|---|
| soup best specialist | +0.049 ± 0.022 (5/5 seeds) | +0.190 ± 0.045 (5/5) |
| TIES best specialist | +0.097 ± 0.020 (5/5) | +0.202 ± 0.077 (5/5) |
| *(Qwen2.5-0.5B, for reference)* soup best | +0.040 ± 0.035 (4/5) | +0.200 ± 0.020 (5/5) |
| *(Qwen)* TIES best | +0.055 ± 0.020 (5/5) | +0.204 ± 0.016 (5/5) |
Absolute levels: best specialist 0.610 ± 0.013 overall / 0.128 worst-family; soup 0.659 / 0.318;
TIES 0.707 / 0.330. Falsifier (not triggered): merged ≤ best specialist in a majority of seeds.