New analytic result for the evolution-of-sex paper: how far can two lineages diverge before recombination (model merging) stops working? Frames merge failure as biological reproductive isolation via Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities. src/knowledge/speciation.py, kind: speciation, on the E7-E11 genotype machinery (pure seeded NumPy, bitwise-reproducible; no external simulator whose separate RNG would break that). - BDM construction (E12.yaml): ancestor + two lineages substituting disjoint loci (each parent adaptive, incompatibility-free), a fraction rho of cross-lineage pairs are BDMIs. Sweeping divergence d reproduces the predicted compatible -> outbreeding depression -> hybrid inviability curve; the isolation cliff moves to lower d as epistasis density rises (iso at d=20: 0.00/0.03/0.50 for rho 0.1/0.25/0.5); incompatibilities snowball ~ (d/2)^2 (Orr-Turelli). - NK variant (E12_nk.yaml): parents = hill-climbed local optima; the epistasis wedge — recombination gain flips 0 -> -0.13 and OD rate 0 -> 0.90 as ruggedness K rises. At matched divergence, mergeability is governed by epistasis, the axis no divergence-only ML merge predictor captures. plot_E12.py (3-panel), +7 tests (138 green), README with honest positioning (concedes the empirical phenomenon to Pari 2024 / Zhou 2026 + permutation artefacts to Git Re-Basin; claims the predictive theory + the epistasis wedge). Wired into make layer1. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
14 lines
No EOL
345 B
JSON
14 lines
No EOL
345 B
JSON
{
|
|
"experiment": "E12",
|
|
"master_seed": 12,
|
|
"git_commit": "ae1779a9a83fc8f9f36019875efed522bf488b9c",
|
|
"python": "3.14.5",
|
|
"libraries": {
|
|
"numpy": "2.5.0",
|
|
"scipy": "1.18.0",
|
|
"pandas": "3.0.3",
|
|
"pyarrow": "24.0.0"
|
|
},
|
|
"rows": 495,
|
|
"results_sha256": "0af2062c00f606ad1c2e6ca9f5974e981e0c15d699510576f5e7c6c84831f2bb"
|
|
} |