Removed from main (all preserved on the dev branch): the arXiv build and
its sources, design documents (blueprint, results summary, review responses,
essay drafts), tasks/ and CLAUDE.md, the cover letter and reference tooling,
two unused manuscript figures, and every experiment that feeds no figure or
number in the paper: the collapse null, the sexual-vs-asexual lineage, the
NK speciation variant, the 0.5B single-seed LLM prototypes, the compose and
society experiments with their calibration and pilot runs, and their
configs, runners, tests, figure scripts and PBS jobs. Their result bundles
are moved to results/_archive/ (ignored) so the parquets stay on disk.
Also: plot_llm_speciation reads the s{seed}/ layout; the mating-breadth
plot writes under its bundle name; Makefile targets reduced to the kept
experiments; REPRODUCING.md and README point to dev for the rest.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y64o8FKP7rCuXzC48pxpMm
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| s1 | ||
| s2 | ||
| s3 | ||
| llm_speciation.pdf | ||
| llm_speciation.png | ||
| README.md | ||
LLM-tier model speciation — conflict provokes isolation; duration alone does not
E13 carried into language-model weights (0.5B Qwen, LoRA children of one frozen base — the shared
base controls a major source of coordinate mismatch, allowing a cleaner test of
conflict-associated merge failure; averaging can still fail for non-conflict reasons — nonlinear
interaction, scaling, capacity — so failures here are conflict-associated, not automatically
functional). Two knobs, pre-registered readings in the
configs; figure llm_speciation.png (3 panels; panel B from results/llm_speciation_add/).
Design. Child A: private family strings; child B: private family arith; shared ambiguous
convention prompts ("Sort the list […]" — no direction stated) answered ascending by A and
descending by B: each convention harmless alone, contradictory jointly (the Bateson–Dobzhansky–
Muller structure). 50/50 soup merge; exact-match verifier; fixed test sets. Coherence of a model =
max(accuracy under asc grading, under desc grading) on the shared prompts — a coherent parent scores
under its own convention; a hybrid mixing conventions scores low under both (the μ(S)/2 floor made
operational).
Finding 1 — function-specific hybrid breakdown (the conflict knob; panel A)
Once the conventions are trained (conflict_frac ≥ 0.25), each parent performs under its own
convention (~0.20–0.25 — low absolute values: sorting long lists is hard for 0.5B) while the merge's
coherence sits at 0.02–0.08, below BOTH parents under either grading — the hybrid loses precisely
the conflicted function. (At frac = 0 no one has seen the ambiguous prompts; that point is a
no-conflict baseline, not part of the cliff.)
Finding 2 — the damage does not spread (the de-confounded add design; panel B)
In the original ("replace") sweep, higher conflict fraction mechanically means less private-family
training, so the merge's private-family decline is confounded. The add design
(llm_speciation_add, 3 seeds) holds each child's private training fixed and adds conflict data on
top: the merge's private-family accuracy then shows no trend with conflict (0.74–0.88, tracking
parent A's 0.82–0.87 within seed noise at every level). Conflict damage is localised to the
conflicted function; it does not corrupt the disjoint skills — at this scale, hybrid breakdown is
surgical, not global. Honest rider: 0.5B soup merges carry large intrinsic seed variance even at
zero conflict (sd up to 0.28) — the same averaging-fragility seen in llm_moe_hard_seeds.
Finding 3 — the duration null: over-specialisation does not erode mergeability (panel C)
Pure disjoint specialists over-trained from 1 to 12 epochs (no shared data at all): the merged model
improves (0.84 → 0.94 mean-private) and stays above the best parent at every duration. The MLP
tier's "no emergent isolation" null (speciation_real_emergent) generalises to LLM weights in
this regime — relevant to the report that averaging prefers under-trained experts (arXiv:2607.11997):
in our disjoint-family setting, no such over-training penalty appears; the theory's prediction is that
their effect should trace to conflicting conventions on shared circuitry, which the
epistasis_predicts experiment (work order) will test directly.
Seeds 2–3 (2026-09-12; hpc/llm_speciation_seeds.pbs, s{seed}/ layout)
Numbers from figures/stats_llm_speciation_seeds.py. Both falsifiers hold in every seed.
Conflict cliff at full conflict — merge coherence vs parents' own-convention accuracy: seed 1
0.02 vs 0.25/0.23; seed 2 0.12 vs 0.24/0.24; seed 3 0.16 vs 0.25/0.24 (merge below both parents,
3/3). Merge coherence across the sweep, mean ± 95% CI: 0.147±0.013 (x=0), 0.117±0.051, 0.117±0.036,
0.147±0.066, 0.100±0.082 (x=1). Duration null — merged mean-private accuracy from 1 to 12 epochs:
seed 1 0.835→0.940, seed 2 0.710→0.955, seed 3 0.735→0.955 (improves in 3/3; mean 0.760±0.075 →
0.950±0.010). Seed 1's cliff is the deepest of the three (0.02 against 0.12/0.16), so the
single-seed figure overstated the depth; the sign is unchanged. Fig. 5C–D now plots seed means with
95% CI bands.
Speciation across all three tiers now reads: analytic (E12: cliff, epistasis-dependence,
snowball) → MLP (E13: functional residual survives the full symmetry group; no emergent isolation) →
LLM (this run: function-specific hybrid breakdown under conflict; no isolation from duration or
specialisation alone). Isolation must be provoked by functional conflict at every tier tested.
Falsifiers (not triggered): merge coherence matching the parents (no breakdown), or merged
private-family accuracy declining with conflict in the add design (global corruption).