- paper/pnas -> paper/manuscript (venue-neutral)
- configs/layer1 -> configs/inheritance, src/knowledge -> src/inheritance
(imported as `inheritance`), make layer1 -> make inheritance; layer2 alias dropped
- inheritance and trained-network bundles named after the manuscript figure
they feed (fig2_grounding_sweep, figS3_rebaselining, ...), or descriptively
where they feed none; configs keep their `experiment:` value so parquet
hashes are unchanged, only output.dir moves
- figure scripts, SI figure sources, notebooks, REPRODUCING.md, README and the
SI Methods/tables updated; make clean no longer deletes tracked manifests;
reproduce.sh hashes the s{seed}/ layouts too
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y64o8FKP7rCuXzC48pxpMm
34 lines
1.7 KiB
YAML
34 lines
1.7 KiB
YAML
experiment: E14
|
|
kind: mating_system
|
|
seed: 20260709
|
|
n_replicates: 20
|
|
|
|
# (Mating systems — monogamy vs promiscuity): a finite population of genotypes evolves on a Kauffman
|
|
# NK landscape, recombining sexually, but the MATE-POOL BREADTH is swept. Agents sit on a ring; an
|
|
# offspring's second parent is drawn from a window of half-width ~ breadth*N/2 around the focal parent,
|
|
# and selection is LOCAL (offspring competes only against the incumbent at its ring position). breadth
|
|
# -> 0 is monogamous / structured (local mating, isolation by distance); breadth = 1 is promiscuous /
|
|
# panmictic (mate with anyone). Crossed with ruggedness K, this is the mating-system image of the E9
|
|
# design rule. Expect: on smooth landscapes (K low) promiscuity maximises the best fitness (spread the
|
|
# single good direction fastest); as ruggedness rises the OPTIMAL breadth SHRINKS toward an intermediate
|
|
# value (full promiscuity prematurely converges below it); and diversity + occupied local optima are
|
|
# monotonically destroyed by breadth at every K, most severely on rugged landscapes. Falsifier: the best
|
|
# breadth is independent of K (no crossover), or promiscuity is best at every ruggedness.
|
|
|
|
mating:
|
|
L: 12 # loci (genotype space 2^L)
|
|
N: 48 # population size (ring positions)
|
|
breadth: 1.0 # mate-pool breadth in [0,1] (overwritten by the sweep)
|
|
K: 0 # landscape ruggedness / epistasis (overwritten by the sweep)
|
|
recomb_rate: 0.5 # per-gap crossover rate (near-free reassortment within a mating)
|
|
mu: 0.003 # per-locus mutation rate
|
|
|
|
generations: 60
|
|
|
|
sweep:
|
|
- param: mating.K
|
|
values: [0, 3, 6, 10]
|
|
- param: mating.breadth
|
|
values: [0.03, 0.08, 0.17, 0.35, 0.6, 1.0]
|
|
|
|
output: {dir: results/figS13_mating_breadth}
|