# E3 — Grounding must overlap the content it protects **Claim tested:** if your budget of real data is fixed, does it matter *where* you spend it? Is it enough to sprinkle real data uniformly, or must it target the knowledge you care about? **Setup (Layer 1, pure math).** `K = 1000` items divided into `R = 10` disjoint **regions** (think subject areas). `n = 200`, 400 generations, 100 repeats. The **same total** real-data budget is spent two ways: **uniform** (spread evenly over all 10 regions) vs **matched** (concentrated on the "exercised" region we want to protect). One region is designated exercised (region 0 here) and has a rare tail we track. ### Symbols - **region** — a block of related items; a stand-in for a task family / subject area. - **matched vs uniform** — real data aimed at the exercised region vs spread evenly, at equal total budget. - **tail items alive** — how many rare items in a region still have any probability. ### The two panels 1. **Target region over time.** Rare-item survival in the exercised region, generation by generation: blue = matched, red = uniform (bands = 95% CI). Matched **holds** the region's tail alive; uniform spreads too thin and lets it **collapse**. 2. **Every region at steady state.** Bar chart of stationary tail survival per region, matched (blue) vs uniform (red); the dotted line marks the exercised region. Matched wins big *there* — at the cost of the regions it deliberately ignores. Uniform is mediocre everywhere. *(Note: per-region diversity `H` is confounded by how much probability mass sits in a region, so this figure uses the honest, mass-independent metric — tail-item survival.)* ### Takeaway Reality checks only protect what they actually cover. To keep a capability alive you must ground **on that capability**, not on data in general — grounding is local, not a global tonic. Key numbers: exercised-region tail survival ≈ **0.49 (matched)** vs **0.07 (uniform)** at equal budget. **Falsifier (not triggered):** if uniform had protected the region as well as matched, the targeting claim would die.