# arXiv submission notes (Phase 2 of the PNAS work order)

**What to upload.** The source package: `main.tex`, `body.tex`, `figs/` (three PDFs). arXiv rejects
TeX-produced PDF-only uploads, so upload source; all packages are standard and `\pdfoutput=1` is set,
so arXiv's pdflatex builds it (verified locally with tectonic; `main.pdf` in this directory is the
reference build, 20 pp). To rebuild after editing the Markdown source of truth:
`python paper/arxiv/md2tex.py && (cd paper/arxiv && tectonic main.tex)`.

**Categories.** Primary: `q-bio.PE` (Populations and Evolution). Cross-list: `cs.LG` and `cs.NE`.
If arXiv asks for an endorsement for q-bio.PE (first submission to the archive), either request it
(an evolutionary-biology colleague with q-bio postings can endorse in one click) or flip primary to
`cs.NE` with `q-bio.PE` as cross-list — the paper is defensible either way; q-bio.PE primary is
preferred for the PNAS audience trail.

**License.** arXiv non-exclusive license (default) is fine for PNAS. Do not pick CC-BY unless you
want it — PNAS permits preprints under any license, but the default keeps options open.

**Abstract for the arXiv field** (plain text, ~1,750 chars — the field caps at 1,920; the paper's
long abstract stays in the PDF):

> AI is shifting from single frozen models to populations of agents that persist, specialise, and are
> recombined into new models. The field describes this with evolutionary vocabulary — crossover, mate
> choice, offspring — but as metaphor over search. We argue the right theory already exists: the
> population genetics of the evolution of sex. Training each generation on the last is genetic drift,
> and model collapse is Muller's ratchet, the decay of an asexual lineage (we take the
> collapse-is-drift diagnosis as settled and cite it). The cure is sexual: ground every generation in
> data from a non-drifting reality (immigration, with a critical real-data fraction far below one);
> recombine many complementary parents (model merging — where recombination preserves the union of
> what the parents kept, while averaging cancels the benefit); and preserve diversity. Offspring then
> exceed every parent (the Fisher-Muller effect, shown in merged language models up to 7B). Sex has a
> limit: as models diverge they can speciate — a merge-compatibility cliff governed by epistasis
> (Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities) whose damage snowballs. We model this and confirm it
> in real weights: a merge barrier survives alignment under the full function-preserving symmetry
> group of the network, rising with functional conflict while hybrid fitness falls to inviability —
> yet absent conflicting training signals, divergently-specialised lineages developed no isolation,
> the merge instead rescuing the forgetting specialists. AI can also do what biology cannot —
> directed sex: unbounded parents, chosen mates, offspring screened before they are kept. We support
> the argument with closed-form-validated simulations, trained networks, an image generator, and LLM
> prototypes, and position it against the 2025-26 evolutionary-AI landscape.

**After posting.** Record the arXiv id in `tasks/workorder-pnas-submission.md`; sync v2 with the
PNAS-submitted text at Phase 5. PNAS permits preprints.