Restructure: descriptive tier and experiment names, paper/manuscript
- paper/pnas -> paper/manuscript (venue-neutral)
- configs/layer1 -> configs/inheritance, src/knowledge -> src/inheritance
(imported as `inheritance`), make layer1 -> make inheritance; layer2 alias dropped
- inheritance and trained-network bundles named after the manuscript figure
they feed (fig2_grounding_sweep, figS3_rebaselining, ...), or descriptively
where they feed none; configs keep their `experiment:` value so parquet
hashes are unchanged, only output.dir moves
- figure scripts, SI figure sources, notebooks, REPRODUCING.md, README and the
SI Methods/tables updated; make clean no longer deletes tracked manifests;
reproduce.sh hashes the s{seed}/ layouts too
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y64o8FKP7rCuXzC48pxpMm
This commit is contained in:
parent
84124de143
commit
ab3dc10587
240 changed files with 477 additions and 476 deletions
32
results/collapse_null/README.md
Normal file
32
results/collapse_null/README.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
|||
# E1 — Distillation without grounding collapses, tail-first
|
||||
|
||||
**Claim tested:** if a model is trained only on the previous model's output, generation after
|
||||
generation, does it lose knowledge — and does the *rare* knowledge go first?
|
||||
|
||||
**Setup (Layer 1, pure math).** A "population" of `K = 500` items with a fixed true frequency
|
||||
`p*` shaped like a Zipf curve (a few common items, a long tail of rare ones). Each generation we
|
||||
draw `n = 100` samples from the current model and refit — **no real data is ever added** (`g = 0`).
|
||||
Run for 600 generations, averaged over 100 independent repeats.
|
||||
|
||||
### Symbols
|
||||
- **`p*`** — the true frequencies (fixed reality). **`p_t`** — the model's frequencies at generation *t* (drifts).
|
||||
- **`H`** heterozygosity = diversity (1 = everything equally likely, 0 = one item left). **`H*`** = diversity of the truth.
|
||||
- **forward-KL** `D(p*‖p_t)` — how far the model has drifted from truth (0 = perfect, grows without bound as the tail is forgotten).
|
||||
- **support** = how many items still have any probability. **head/tail** = common/rare items.
|
||||
|
||||
### The three panels
|
||||
1. **Geometric decay.** Blue = the simulated diversity `H`; black dashed = the exact textbook law
|
||||
`H₀·(1 − 1/n)^t`. They sit on top of each other — the loss of diversity is *exactly* the
|
||||
population-genetics drift law, not an approximation. (This is the validation gate: if these two
|
||||
curves disagreed, the simulator would be wrong.)
|
||||
2. **Tail dies first** (log axis). Red = fraction of *rare* (tail) items still alive; green =
|
||||
fraction of *common* (head) items still alive. The red curve plunges far faster — rare knowledge
|
||||
is lost roughly an order of magnitude sooner than common knowledge.
|
||||
3. **Collapse.** Purple (left axis, log) = number of distinct items surviving, falling from 500
|
||||
toward ~1 (everything collapses onto a single dominant item). Orange (right axis) = forward-KL to
|
||||
truth, diverging as the tail vanishes.
|
||||
|
||||
### Takeaway
|
||||
Unchecked model-on-model training is a ratchet: diversity decays on a precise mathematical schedule,
|
||||
and the rare tail is destroyed first. **Falsifier (not triggered):** if `H` had stayed flat, the
|
||||
whole thesis would fail. It didn't.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue