Restructure: descriptive tier and experiment names, paper/manuscript
- paper/pnas -> paper/manuscript (venue-neutral)
- configs/layer1 -> configs/inheritance, src/knowledge -> src/inheritance
(imported as `inheritance`), make layer1 -> make inheritance; layer2 alias dropped
- inheritance and trained-network bundles named after the manuscript figure
they feed (fig2_grounding_sweep, figS3_rebaselining, ...), or descriptively
where they feed none; configs keep their `experiment:` value so parquet
hashes are unchanged, only output.dir moves
- figure scripts, SI figure sources, notebooks, REPRODUCING.md, README and the
SI Methods/tables updated; make clean no longer deletes tracked manifests;
reproduce.sh hashes the s{seed}/ layouts too
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y64o8FKP7rCuXzC48pxpMm
This commit is contained in:
parent
84124de143
commit
ab3dc10587
240 changed files with 477 additions and 476 deletions
27
configs/inheritance/figS10_rugged_landscapes.yaml
Normal file
27
configs/inheritance/figS10_rugged_landscapes.yaml
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
|||
experiment: E9
|
||||
kind: recomb_landscape
|
||||
seed: 20260705
|
||||
n_replicates: 24
|
||||
|
||||
# (Landscape robustness / the "why sex?" question — the credibility centerpiece): E8 showed sex wins
|
||||
# on an ADDITIVE landscape, where recombination trivially helps. Does it survive EPISTASIS? Parents
|
||||
# are local optima ("trained models") of a Kauffman NK landscape whose ruggedness K (epistatic
|
||||
# interactions per locus) is swept with the recombination rate. Expect: on smooth/mildly-rugged
|
||||
# landscapes recombination helps; on rugged ones FREE recombination (rate~0.5) breaks co-adapted
|
||||
# blocks and offspring fall BELOW the parents (outbreeding depression); and the OPTIMAL recombination
|
||||
# rate shrinks as ruggedness grows. Design rule: merge freely when skills are complementary/additive;
|
||||
# merge sparingly when entangled. Falsifier: recombination rate has no effect, or free recombination
|
||||
# never underperforms the parents on rugged landscapes.
|
||||
|
||||
society:
|
||||
L: 12
|
||||
n_parents: 6 # trained specialists = local optima of the landscape
|
||||
pop: 200 # recombinant offspring sampled per (K, rate, replicate)
|
||||
|
||||
sweep:
|
||||
- param: K
|
||||
values: [0, 2, 4, 6, 8] # landscape ruggedness (epistasis): 0 = additive, high = rugged
|
||||
- param: rate
|
||||
values: [0.0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.35, 0.5] # clonal -> free recombination
|
||||
|
||||
output: {dir: results/figS10_rugged_landscapes}
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue