second review round: tempered claims, robust statistics, corrected technical statements
Analyses (figures/stats_llm_epistasis.py, committed + reproducible): condition-clustered bootstrap CIs (functional measures exclude zero: dis_raw [+0.04,+0.69], conf-weighted [+0.02,+0.68]; gradient alignment [-0.59,-0.06]; geometry straddles zero), PAIRED predictor contrasts (not individually significant — stated), leave-one-condition-out held-out prediction (functional replicates, geometry ~0, performance baseline unstable), three outcome references (ordering sensitive to reference — reported, with the mechanism), between/within-axis decomposition (within-conflict identification impossible by design; the compat axis identifies), and seed-level paired reliability (routing/directed beat soup 3/3 seeds incl. one catastrophic soup failure; CI-width fragility claim withdrawn). Renames and corrections: "decisive experiment" -> "controlled predictive test"; "operational epistasis" -> "confidence-weighted functional conflict (proposed proxy)"; "functional by construction" -> "controls a major source of coordinate mismatch / conflict-associated" (module, configs, READMEs, figures); SI proposition's "chord" defined precisely (endpoint-loss interpolation, invariant) vs the path (not invariant) + no-global-optimality caveat (removable = lower bound, residual = upper); snowball count != performance cliff distinction added; claims table gains four rows (grid finding / weighting NOT supported / functional-vs- all-geometry not established / operator choice open); §1 ladder states the prediction rung as a bounded small-model result. paper/response-to-review-2.md: point-by-point, opening with the bookkeeping correction (E13b/c were in the reviewed draft — revised interpretation, not new results). READMEs rewritten around the four analyses with the chronology (prospective/adaptive/post-hoc) disclosed. 151 tests green. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BkRLcc18rwT2Lysu6PbG7v
This commit is contained in:
parent
1ae950cb7c
commit
a40ace1821
17 changed files with 418 additions and 95 deletions
|
|
@ -14,8 +14,9 @@ tracks its parents (conflict damage localised to the conflicted function) or fal
|
|||
model's private-family accuracy stays above the best parent at every duration. The MLP tier's
|
||||
"no emergent isolation" null generalises to LLM weights in this regime.
|
||||
|
||||
Because LoRA deltas share the frozen base's coordinates, none of this involves alignment ambiguity:
|
||||
every failure shown is functional by construction.
|
||||
The shared frozen base controls a major source of coordinate mismatch (LoRA deltas share its
|
||||
coordinates), allowing a cleaner test of conflict-associated merging failure — though averaging can
|
||||
still fail for non-conflict reasons (nonlinear interaction, scaling, capacity).
|
||||
|
||||
Usage: python figures/plot_llm_speciation.py
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
|
@ -86,8 +87,8 @@ def main() -> None:
|
|||
ax.legend(frameon=False, fontsize=8)
|
||||
|
||||
fig.suptitle("LLM-tier model speciation: conflict provokes function-specific hybrid breakdown; "
|
||||
"no isolation emerges from duration alone (LoRA shares base coordinates — failures are "
|
||||
"functional by construction)", y=1.03, fontsize=11.5)
|
||||
"no isolation emerges from duration alone (shared base controls coordinate mismatch — "
|
||||
"a cleaner test of conflict-associated failure)", y=1.03, fontsize=11.5)
|
||||
fig.tight_layout()
|
||||
savefig(fig, "results/llm_speciation", "llm_speciation")
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue