giorgio/MachineSex
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Fig. 1 doubles as a map of the paper: per-cell figure/panel tags

Browse source 
Each filled cell now carries, in its bottom-right corner, the figure or table
where that result is reported (Fig. 2A ... Figs. 7E-F, 3C-D); the caption says
so. Building the mapping surfaced one imprecise citation: the bred-and-screened
seed-replication claim cited Fig. 3A, whose panel shows the soup/ties bars -
that result lives in SI Appendix Table S2, and the citation now says so.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BkRLcc18rwT2Lysu6PbG7v
This commit is contained in:
Giorgio Gilestro 2026-09-07 12:10:51 +01:00
parent 9b0ca32f51
commit 16e9002773
6 changed files with 18 additions and 5 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

3
paper/pnas/main.md
View file

@ -237,7 +237,8 @@ parents, choose complementary mates, and *screen many candidate offspring agains
keeping one*. This directed sex converts the outbreeding catastrophe into a reliable gain in the
model (tracking or exceeding the best parent at every ruggedness) and replicates as a sign in language
models: bred-and-screened merges beat the a-priori blend in every seed on headroom tasks, including
one seed where the blend failed catastrophically and selection was immune (Fig. 3A). Finally,
one seed where the blend failed catastrophically and selection was immune (SI Appendix,
Table S2). Finally,
population *structure* is itself a knob: sweeping the mate-pool breadth from monogamous (repeated
local pairings) to promiscuous (*panmixia*: any model may merge with any other) against ruggedness,
wide mixing maximises the population mean while